Three New arXiv Papers Examine LLM Capabilities in Question Answering, Recommendation Systems, and Debate Generation

Three New arXiv Papers Examine LLM Capabilities

Three recent papers on arXiv explore different aspects of Large Language Model capabilities and limitations.

Retrieval Augmented Question Answering (arXiv:2512.23836v1) investigates when LLMs should acknowledge knowledge gaps in retrieval-augmented generation systems. According to the abstract, the research examines “the use of LLMs for retrieval augmented question answering” in the context of expanded context windows, though the abstract text was truncated in the source material.

Collaborative Signal Understanding (arXiv:2505.20730v3) focuses on whether LLMs can effectively process collaborative information in recommender systems. The paper states that “collaborative information from user-item interactions is a fundamental source of signal in successful recommender systems” and examines recent attempts to “incorporate this knowledge into large language model-based recommender” approaches.

Debate Generation Framework (arXiv:2512.24684v1) introduces R-Debater, described as “an agentic framework for generating multi-turn debates built on argumentative memory.” According to the abstract, the system is “grounded in rhetoric and memory studies” and “views debate as a process of recalling and adapting prior arguments to maintain stance” consistency.

All three papers represent cross-disciplinary work spanning AI and their respective application domains.