Three New arXiv Papers Address LLM Applications and Biases

Three New arXiv Papers Address LLM Applications and Biases

Three new papers posted to arXiv explore different aspects of large language model (LLM) applications and limitations.

Zero-shot 3D Map Generation

According to arXiv paper 2512.10501v1, researchers propose a “training-free” dual-agent architecture for Procedural Content Generation (PCG). The abstract states that while PCG “offers scalable methods for algorithmically creating complex, customizable worlds,” controlling these pipelines typically “requires the precise configuration of opaque technical parameters.” The paper introduces an LLM-based approach to address this challenge.

Cooperative RAG for Question Answering

Paper 2512.10422v1 addresses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), noting that “large language models (LLMs) have a tendency to generate factually inaccurate output.” The researchers describe RAG as “a key means to mitigate this downside” and propose a cooperative approach involving “mutual information exchange and ranking by contrasting layers.”

Gender Bias Analysis

A revised paper (2504.01951v2) examines gender bias in LLMs through online shopping data. According to the abstract, “With the wide and cross-domain adoption of Large Language Models, it becomes crucial to assess to which extent the statistical correlations in training data, which underlie their impressive performance, hide subtle and potentially troubling biases.”

All three papers are cross-listed or categorized under cs.AI (Artificial Intelligence) on arXiv.